United States & Canada International
Home PageMagazineTravelPersonalsAbout
Advertise with us     Subscriptions     Contact us     Site map     Translate    

Table Of Contents
high school quarterback hard-on

 Magazine Feature Features Archive  
December 2007 Email this to a friend
Check out reader comments

This is a high school quarterback playing with his hard-on
Uttering that sentence about a picture of a sandwich in the U.S. could get you 20 years in prison for 'pandering.'

On October 30, the law providing the set-up to the headline -- the 2003 "PROTECT Act" -- was defended by the Bush administration before the U.S. Supreme Court. Last year, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta struck down sections of the law. Many observers predict the high court will reinstate them, in a case that could be a harbinger for the fate of the porn record-keeping rules recently declared unconstitutional by the 6th Circuit in Ohio.

Michael William was challenging his conviction for "pandering." He had claimed to an undercover cop that he had sexually explicit photos of his daughter, photos that, in fact he didn't have and didn't exist. He was convicted anyway (for those claims and possessing other illegal porn) and sentenced to five-year terms on each charge.

View our poll archive
person "panders" if he "advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits" any "material or purported material" in a manner that "reflects the belief" or is "intended to cause another to believe" that what's being referred to is a fictional drawing or photo of a minor engaged in sexual conduct.

In April 2006, the 11th Circuit threw out Williams's pandering conviction, citing the high court's 2002 ruling in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (the same group fighting the new onerous record-keeping regulations): "The right to think is the beginning of freedom, and speech must be protected from the government because speech is the beginning of thought."

Sometime before its recess next June, a Supreme Court now less likely to wax so poetic over the First Amendment will rule whether people should go to jail for calling a ham sandwich a masturbating high-school quarterback.

Guidemag.com Reader Comments
You are not logged in.

No comments yet, but click here to be the first to comment on this Magazine Feature!

Custom Search


My Guide
Register Now!
Remember me!
Forget Your Password?

This Month's Travels
Travel Article Archive
Seen in
See Guidemag.com for new content
Cactus Canyon, St. Louis Area

From our archives

Circumcision to go!

Personalize your

If you haven't signed up for the free MyGuide service you are missing out on the following features:

- Monthly email when new
issue comes out
- Customized "Get MyGuys"
personals searching
- Comment posting on magazine
articles, comment and

Register now

Quick Links: Get your business listed | Contact us | Site map | Privacy policy

  Translate into   Translation courtesey of www.freetranslation.com

Question or comments about the site?
Please contact webmaster@guidemag.com
Copyright 1998-2018 Fidelity Publishing, All rights reserved.